Ideas are for sharing, not sheltering

Too often we hide our ideas out of fear they might break or be torn apart before they’ve had a chance to shine. We want our ideas to be perfectly polished before we share them with anyone, before we line them up in front of what could very well be a firing squad. We fear criticism and judgement and the possibility that our ideas aren’t as great as we want them to.

Where does this fear come from and is it possible the feeling of wanting to shelter our ideas is not entirely rational?

If we think of our ideas as reflections of ourselves—our capabilities, our beliefs, our IQ—then of course it’s going to be scary to expose them to others. The last thing any of us want is to be told we’re not capable, that our beliefs are wrong, or that we overlooked something obvious. We don’t want to be dumb or wrong, so we shelter our ideas until we’ve had a chance to ensure they’re “good enough.”

The trick is that ideas are never good enough until they face the light of other perspectives and opinions. Any idea can be viewed as good if it exists only within your head. It’s when the idea gets let loose in the world that it has a chance to grow, strengthen, and evolve.

When we step back and see our ideas as being their own objects, not pieces of ourselves or our intelligence, it becomes easier to share them.

And sharing our ideas matters because, despite what our fears may make us believe, when ideas are hammered and cut and torn apart they inevitably end up becoming stronger, not weaker.

The reality is that our ideas can never be destroyed, every idea you have is nearly indestructible. Once you’ve had a really good idea, it isn’t going to go anywhere. The idea will stay with you in some form or another, in the recesses of the complex biological machine that is your brain.

Our ideas simply cannot be destroyed. Just ask anyone with a strong political or religious idea, or consider the last time a catchy song got stuck in your head. Once an idea takes hold in your mind, it’s hard to get rid of it.

What happens when we expose our ideas is they don’t get destroyed, they evolve. That evolution is the process that makes ideas worthwhile, real, not merely imaginary beliefs sheltered within the confines of our imaginations.

When we expose our ideas to criticism and feedback the ideas don’t really get destroyed or damaged, they strengthen and grow. What can happen is ideas change, shaped by the opinions and information we get from others. And these changes may weaken *our* initial perspective or vision of an idea, but the fundamental idea will still be there in the foundation of whatever new or different ideas come from the feedback we get. Better, faster, bigger, stronger. If we’re open to the feedback.

And, of course, we have to remember that the feedback we get on our ideas isn’t feedback on us. We are not our ideas; our ideas are our ideas. And they need the ability to distance themselves from us if they’re to really grow.

Nothing happens with your ideas if you shelter them. If you wait for perfection you’ll be waiting your whole life. Instead: speed up the process of improving your ideas by getting them out into the world where they’ll have a chance to improve and expand based on the feedback they incur.



Why pursue creative ideas, even when you’re bound to be wrong

We tend celebrate the creative thinkers among us not merely for their successful ideas, but for their courage.

Any time someone has the guts to question the status quo, to propose an alternative way forward, or to create in the wake of destruction, they’re doing so at cost. Cost to their reputation, or well-being, or way of life.

When they turn out to be right we celebrate whatever it is they’ve unlocked: a new idea, a new way of seeing, a new object of creation. Their struggle and courage often falls behind the wayside, overshadowed by the result of their efforts.

When they’re wrong the creative person still has a tremendous impact on the world, but one that is quietly valued rather than openly and loudly celebrated. If you want to be a creative thinker this is an important lesson to be mindful of.

Sometimes, for a few of us, the courage to press forward and try something new and different is enough to captivate an audience. Even if just an audience of one, they watch by the sidelines as we struggle and climb and destroy and create endlessly. And sometimes that’s enough; to keep going, to keep trying, to keep creating.

Because what we often find when we push through in-spite of a lack of any victory, is things change. We make an impact merely by trying. As my friend Deb once told me:

“If you win, you lead. If you lose, you guide.”

Meaning: if your idea or creation or whatever works out, you end up leading others; to use your creation, to follow your way of thinking, to do or see things differently. And if your work ends up failing, you’re still adding value to those paying attention. You show them where not to go, how not to think, what not to try. If your idea or creation wins, you lead. If it fails, you guide. Both are important and necessary in the world we live in.

After more than 10 years I still blog about creativity. Not for the esteem or celebration or whatever else. I write on creativity because no matter what happens I’m influencing and inspiring others.

Even those who don’t agree with everything I write are impacted by what they read. Maybe they feel motivated to prove me wrong, or to write their own arguments, or to share and chastise. Others are inspired, moved to action, given a few moments for reflection. Either way: these small, uncelebrated ideas have an affect on those who come across them.

By putting the words out into the world I’m shaping it. And you can too. All it takes is the courage to start: writing a post, sharing an idea, recording a video or podcast, drawing and sharing what you doodle on Instagram, you name it.

When we step up to not only have ideas, but also have the courage to share them and put them to the test, we’re saying: “I want to see where this goes and anyone who’s paying attention is welcome to come along for the ride.” And that, I think, is enough to celebrate for ourselves.



Creativity is making the small change

It's easy to think of creativity as being about big ideas. We live in a world where big ideas are prized and celebrated and smaller ideas get pushed away. We celebrate those who have big ideas and we cherish the larger-than-life works they produce.

But at the heart of all big ideas are small changes: the minor influences that shape a concept, or spark an insight.

They're easy to overlook and their impact can be hard to understand, so we tend to brush them aside. Even in our own lives: small creative changes can feel unworthy of celebrating. We make a small change but because it's size is relatively small we fail to see it as being impactful.

One reason I love writing is because the influence a small change can have is immediately evident.

Changing the inflection of one word in a sentence dramatically effects what it the sentence is trying to convey. This is known as contrastive stress and by the nature of how we read it forces the reader to consider the contrast of what's being emphasized:

He said she was the last one to leave the room.

Is this "he" to be trusted? Who else may have an opinion on the matter?

He said she was the last one to leave the room.

Is the statement itself to be trusted? If he said she was last to leave the room, what other evidence is there that this is the case? What is not being said?

He said she was the last one to leave the room.

Emphasizing the second character makes the phrase almost accusatory. Who is this "she"? What other information can we learn from her?

In the world of visuals small changes can have a dramatic effect as well. No where is this clearer than the human face, where we convey seemingly simple emotions through thousands of small signals around our eyes, mouth, nose, ears, angle of our head, and so on.

If we take a simple and meaningless-out-of-context cartoon comic panel, this one from the comic strip Garfield, we can see how something as simple as drawing on eyebrows can change what the panel is trying to communicate.

garfield1.png

Add in some angled eyebrows, a single line with a pointed center, and the mood of the panel shifts entirely:

garfield2.png

Or inverse the angle and the mood of the panel flips too:

garfield3.png

In each of these examples the only thing we're doing is making one very small change: emphasis of a single word, or the angle of a single line, yet with each change comes a dramatic effect.

The same point is true of the ideas we have: small, almost effortless changes can have incredible impact. From how we think about a problem to how we view someone, subtleties play a big part in the larger picture.

Perhaps part of the reason we tend to celebrate the bigger changes—the invention of the airplane or the shift from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles—over the smaller ones—deciding to wear a different type of shirt out or adding a line to the face of a cartoon character—is because the smaller changes are easier to do.

It doesn't take much to incorporate a small change in anything.

Yet we also tend to ignore making these small changes for the same reasons: if they're easy to do, they must not be worthwhile.

Of course we can see that this isn't the case. Small changes have really profound impact, particularly when you scale them: what would happen in the Garfield comic above if we drew a second angled line on Garfield the cat? What would happen if we emphasized two separate words in a sentence?

If you want to be creative you don't need to focus on big changes or global-sized problems; you merely need to look at what small changes you can make now, then make them. Not because they're easy, but because until you make the change you won't really know the affect it can have.

Creativity is making small changes. Easy to forget, but also easy to try.



Why regular rituals matter when it comes to creativity

Rituals are important when it comes to creativity.

It’s regularly discussed that routine stifles creativity, and to a degree this is absolutely true. If you stick so rigidly to routine you’ll rarely have an original experience from which to drive creative thought.

As the saying goes: you can’t do the same thing over and over and expect something different to happen as a result.

But the benefit of routine on creativity cannot be overstated. Routines are important because they give us a base of expectation: how do you know you’re experiencing something new and different if you don’t have a base, a routine, from which to measure?

Experts are all about routine. Doctors need routine to conduct surgery, airline pilots need routine to ensure a safe trip, and chefs need routine to deliver what’s promised. You wouldn’t want to visit a doctor who begins a major operation by saying “Let’s see what happens today.”

sir-alexander-fleming-9296894-1-402.jpg

As a most famous example of the importance of routine: in 1928 Scottish physician Alexander Fleming returned to work after holiday to discover a culture contaminated with a fungus which was keeping colonies of the bacteria staphylococci at Bay. Rather than throwing the petri dish out because of the contamination, Fleming instead looked closely at the dish and commented: “that’s funny.”

After some research on the fungus and it’s affect on bacteria, Fleming ended up having had discovered penicillin, one of the first major antibiotics against many bacterial infections.

If Fleming had not maintained a professional routine, he may have never have noticed the contaminated dish in his lab.

It’s often easy to look at great creative thinkers and remark on their lack of routine or structure—Fleming’s lab was notably in a constant state of disarray and Einstein’s desk was regularly covered in mountains of unorganized papers—but what appears to be chaos on the outside is well-thought out structure to the thinker.

We need routine for many reasons. When it comes to creativity routine enables us to notice when things change, when there’s something funny or interesting worth pursuing further. We don’t get to uncover the unique and valuable if we’re in a constant state of unexpectedness. The ground is always beneath us, which makes it easier to determine when we’re flying or falling.



Impossible as a perspective we keep

ian-dooley-407846.jpg

We say “when pigs fly” whenever we’re describing something impossible. It’s a way of saying something will never happen, to scoff at over ambition, “yeah right, when pigs fly.”

Pigs may not have wings but these days it’s not out of the realm of possibilities for them to fly. All you have to do is put one on an airplane, or in a hot air balloon.

A thousand years ago the only way to understand the idea of someone or something flying was to think of it within the contexts of magic or godliness.

People didn’t fly, it just wasn’t something that was capable of happening. Whenever people imagined flying back then they did so from the perspective of magic or otherworldliness. Gods flew, birds too, but people or pigs? Never going to happen, impossible.

Today more than 2.5 million people fly every day within the United States alone. 45,000 ft in the air, 250 meters a second, millions and millions of miles traveled a day. But if you were to travel back in time and repeat those numbers to someone they’d have a hard time comprehending what you were saying. To those who lived a thousand years ago flying was impossible, not only for pigs but for people too.

Yet here we are: millions of people doing the impossible every day.

It turns out impossible isn’t as precise as its description implies: “something unable to occur or exist.” Something that’s impossible from one perspective or frame of understanding is normal in another. As humans we may be incapable of flying without the gravity-defying support of an airplane, but we are flying nonetheless every time we travel in one. Flying therefore is no longer impossible. Pigs can fly every day now.

”It always seems impossible until it’s done.” — Nelson Mandela

In order to provoke creative thinking we often need to change the lens we use when looking at a problem or statement. What’s impossible here and now, with our current understanding or perspective, may be entirely possible if all we do is change the way we’re looking at it: if we flip it around, change the context, introduce a new technology or facet, remove a piece, or put the thing into something else—like a pig into an airplane.

"The ability to see an idea, or a thing, from many different perspectives is among the greatest assets a thinking person can have." — Scott Berkun in his book The Dance of the Possible

Another way to invoke that unique lens or perspective is to talk to someone else, or read a book. What’s impossible or far-fetched to you may be an everyday occurrence for someone else. The person who lived a thousand years ago spent every day talking about how pigs or people could never fly, but today we know that’s not only possible, but a regular thing.

What else might we think is limited, only to find it’s not when we change the contexts? Who might know? You won’t get answers just thinking about these things: you have to imagine alternatives, go out and try to create things, and talk to those who may have a different perspective.